Blog

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not just a buzzword, it’s a revolution that is reshaping various industries. Jensen, a prominent figure in the field, emphasizes this point, highlighting the shift from general-purpose computing to accelerated computing (Jensen, 2024). I concur with Jensen’s belief that this shift is the foundation for the next generation of software, generative AI.

Jensen also discusses the democratization of high-performance computing, stating that it has enabled researchers worldwide to advance AI (Jensen, 2024). I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment. The concept of “Sovereign AI,” where every country owns the production of their own intelligence, is particularly intriguing. Jensen suggests that the first step for any developing nation should be to build infrastructure and codify their culture into a large language model (Jensen, 2024). This idea resonates with me as it emphasizes the importance of cultural preservation and technological advancement.

However, AI is not without its fears and criticisms. Jensen touches on this, stating that it’s crucial to develop, apply, and use the technology safely (Jensen, 2024). He advocates for the democratization of AI and criticizes those who try to mystify or monopolize the technology. I stand with Jensen on this matter. The democratization of AI is essential for ensuring that the benefits of this technology are accessible to all.

Open-source systems and the role of GPUs in their development are also emphasized. Jensen believes that NVIDIA GPUs are unique because they democratize AI for everyone, being available on every platform (Jensen, 2024). I share this belief. NVIDIA’s adaptability and innovation have allowed it to remain relevant through the evolution of AI.

When it comes to education, Jensen suggests an interesting perspective. Instead of everyone learning to program, he believes that the goal should be to create computing technology that anyone can use, effectively making everyone a programmer (Jensen, 2024). This approach, he argues, has closed the technology divide and democratized AI. I find this perspective refreshing and forward-thinking.

Finally, Jensen advises that if he were to choose a major at university now, he would focus on understanding human biology. He believes that the field of life sciences is moving from being a field of discovery to a field of engineering, and that this will lead to significant advancements in the future (Jensen, 2024). I find this insight fascinating and agree that the intersection of biology and engineering holds immense potential.

In conclusion, Jensen’s thoughts on AI, its democratization, and its potential for the future resonate with me. His positive outlook for an era of discovery and proliferation to address current challenges is inspiring. As we navigate the AI revolution, it’s crucial to remember the importance of democratization, safety, and the potential for AI to bridge the technology divide.